Quartz Watches VS Mechanical Watches

I know that dichotomy is almost as old as quartz own, and that, however much they blindly defend one or another technology, there will always be people who believe their decision on a clock type versus another is the best and most logical. But it is not our intention to enter into controversies like that, but simply explain the pros and cons of each type of clock for then each draw their own conclusions, considering what you like, what you need and what search. So we will give the key points to have arguments and essential foundation which will provide us the decision, if anyone is still wondering, what kind of watch he shall pay more.

Mechanical Watch

They need oiling each about 10 years, although brands such as Citizen watches have to be oiled which can last more than 20 years with portable watch repair tool.

They are more prone to, so common in modern society electromagnetic fields. However, there are anti-magnetic models, but are very expensive. What I endure are electromagnetic impulses.

They are far more inaccurate than a quartz watch, and tend to be affected more easily by temperature changes. A mechanical watch can have a tolerance of accuracy up to 30 seconds per day, while quartz that tolerance (or even less) per month.

Quartz Watch

Batteries are a highly polluting and recycling complex element.

To store them for long periods must disarm and withdraw the batteries, like the YAZOLE 306 quartz watch.

If the battery model is very stilted or stops made, the quartz watch would be useless. This does not happen with you mechanical watches. The same ingredients and chips.

Maintaining quartz watches generally can be more expensive if, for example, every two years you have to change the battery. Finally in stack costs, together or sealing tests you would spend more than one mechanical maintenance.